Justice M. R. Shah and Justice A. S. Bopanna of the top court observed that the Hindu Marriage Act provisions are for relief in terms of divorce etc between husband and wife only and no extension to the third party.The court while partly allowing the appeal had set aside the decision of the High Court,Continue reading "HMA: RELIEF IN TERMS OF DIVORCE ETC ONLY BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE; NO EXTENSION TO THIRD PARTY"
DELAYED FILING OF APPLICATION FOR STAMP DUTY REFUND DUE TO JUDICIAL DELAY NOT BE REJECTED
Justice Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and Justice B.V. Nagarathna of the Supreme Court that delay in filing the application for refund of stamp duty due to judicial delay then such applications not to be rejected. The court while allowing the appeal had set aside the decision of the High Court and directed the refund toContinue reading "DELAYED FILING OF APPLICATION FOR STAMP DUTY REFUND DUE TO JUDICIAL DELAY NOT BE REJECTED"
WHEN CAN AN APPELLATE COURT ORDER RETRIAL?
Justice Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Justice Vikram Nath and Justice B. V. Nagarathna of the Supreme Court noted that situations when an Appellate Court can order re-trial. The court while allowing the appeal had set aside the decision of the High Court and remitted the matter to High Court to be decided afresh.As per theContinue reading "WHEN CAN AN APPELLATE COURT ORDER RETRIAL?"
SC: SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION FILED AGAINST ONLY A REVIEW ORDER WOULDNT BE MAINTAINABLE
Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice M. M. Sundresh of the top court noted that special leave petition that had been filed against only a review order wouldn’t be maintainable and the court dismissed the same.The petitioner had already filed a special leave petition before the Supreme Court and the court dismissed it which ledContinue reading "SC: SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION FILED AGAINST ONLY A REVIEW ORDER WOULDNT BE MAINTAINABLE"
LEGALFLAME 